Undercarriage Damage Quotes & Sayings

Some people never seem to learn from experience. No matter how often they had seen the lion devour the lamb, they continued to cling to the hope that the nature of the beast might change. If only the lion could get to know the lamb better, they argued, or talk matters over ... — Emma Goldman

The forces of nature aren't arbitrarily selected in some way by
chance or design, they are simply the possible directions of time. — Gevin Giorbran

When you've taken all you can, walk away. Be the bigger person. Or at least find a bigger person. — Molly Harper

Many writing texts caution against asking friends to read your stuff, suggesting you're not apt to get a very unbiased opinion[.] ... It's unfair, according to this view, to put a pal in such a position. What happens if he/she feels he/she has to say, "I'm sorry, good buddy, you've written some great yarns in the past but this one sucks like a vacuum cleaner"?
The idea has some validity, but I don't think an unbiased opinion is exactly what I'm looking for. And I believe that most people smart enough to read a novel are also tactful enough to find a gentler mode of expression than "This sucks." (Although most of us know that "I think this has a few problems" actually means "This sucks," don't we?) — Stephen King

Christianity must be regarded not as a final revelation but as a phase of revelation. — Rebecca West

No food or drug will ever do for you what a fresh supply of oxygen will. — Tony Robbins

I'd watch her, amazed at just how much a person could accomplish fueled by tea and regret. — Katja Millay

If you are weak, anyone can come and kick you — Jemima Khan

First of all, if you're setting up a new company, you want to try to find a brand that can work on a global basis. — Richard Branson

Rosalind exploded with a shriek worthy of a tea-kettle. — Emma Clifton

I woke up to the world of science when my high school chemistry teacher introduced me to the elegantly ordered periodic table. — Isadore Singer

The older theories, which started from an erroneous conception of the social demand for money, could never arrive at a solution of this problem. Their sole contribution is limited to paraphrases of the proposition that an increase in the stock of money at the disposal of the community while the demand for it rClnains the same decreases the objective exchange-value of money, and that an increase of the demand with a constant available stock has the contrary effect, and so on. By a flash of genius, the formulators of the Quantity Theory had already recognized this. We cannot by any means call it an advance when the formula giving the amount of the demand for money (Volume of Transactions + Velocity of Circulation) was reduced to its elements. — Ludwig Von Mises