Famous Quotes & Sayings

Pragmatism Vs Idealism Quotes & Sayings

Enjoy reading and share 8 famous quotes about Pragmatism Vs Idealism with everyone.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Pinterest Share on Linkedin

Top Pragmatism Vs Idealism Quotes

Pragmatism Vs Idealism Quotes By Stephen L. Burns

Blogging, writing conventional articles, and being science consultant and pocket protector ninja to various web portals and TV programs, quite often trying to promote the penicillin of hard data to people who had no interest in being cured of their ignorance. — Stephen L. Burns

Pragmatism Vs Idealism Quotes By Danny Strong

Idealism loses to pragmatism when it comes to winning elections. — Danny Strong

Pragmatism Vs Idealism Quotes By Simon Sinek

Pure pragmatism can't imagine a bold future. Pure idealism can't get anything done. It is the delicate blend of both that drives innovation. — Simon Sinek

Pragmatism Vs Idealism Quotes By Richard M. Nixon

Idealism without pragmatism is impotent. Pragmatism without idealism is meaningless. The key to effective leadership is pragmatic idealism. — Richard M. Nixon

Pragmatism Vs Idealism Quotes By Bono

You see, idealism detached from action is just a dream. But idealism allied with pragmatism, with rolling up your sleeves and making the world bend a bit, is very exciting. It's very real. It's very strong. — Bono

Pragmatism Vs Idealism Quotes By G.K. Chesterton

They said that I should lose my ideals and begin to believe in the methods of practical politicians. Now, I have not lost my ideals in the least; my faith in fundamentals is exactly what it always was. What I have lost is my childlike faith in practical politics. — G.K. Chesterton

Pragmatism Vs Idealism Quotes By Karl Popper

Whenever a theory appears to you as the only possible one, take this as a sign that you have neither understood the theory nor the problem which it was intended to solve. — Karl Popper

Pragmatism Vs Idealism Quotes By William James

See the exquisite contrast of the types of mind! The pragmatist clings to facts and concreteness, observes truth at its work in particular cases, and generalises. Truth, for him, becomes a class-name for all sorts of definite working-values in experience. For the rationalist it remains a pure abstraction, to the bare name of which we must defer. When the pragmatist undertakes to show in detail just why we must defer, the rationalist is unable to recognise the concretes from which his own abstraction is taken. He accuses us of denying truth; whereas we have only sought to trace exactly why people follow it and always ought to follow it. Your typical ultra-abstractions fairly shudders at concreteness: other things equal, he positively prefers the pale and spectral. If the two universes were offered, he would always choose the skinny outline rather than the rich thicket of reality. It is so much purer, clearer, nobler. — William James